Quote:Just a suggestion:
Obviously, Element names are great for data entry people becuase the names are more user friendly, but when the user switches to Table View, they dont recognize the column names at the top of each column. It seems that the user would benefit better from seeing the header bars at the table view showing the "Element Name" rather than the "Bound To" field. (How about an option the user can select as to which names to use)
Table view is largely intended as a diagnostic and data repair facility (much as it was intended (and used) in Q&A). In that light, the data is shown with the least formatting and the actual field names are used. The idea being that nothing is disguised. You know precisely what you are editing and what the database engine believes its value to be. Furthermore, event programming is turned completely off - so that edits are not altered before being sent to the engine. It is really the only way in Sesame to get to the actual data as it appears on the engine, by the name the engine uses.
It may well be, that we'll introduce a second table view that is intended for data entry by end users, that formats values, that runs event programming, that uses LE names insteads of field names, supports non-mandatory restrictions, etc... But, as it stands, these features would each in their own way, obscure or interfere with table view's ability to operate as a low level access point to the actual data.
Because, table view does allow this kind of necessary access, you will note that the "data entry" user level is given only "read only" access to table view.
Quote:Also, it sure would be nice to have at least a bit more power in Table View, such as being able to select multiple columns, or rows, or even cells, when copying and pasting.
We are finding that we have to export our data to excel just so we can copy and paste several rows at a time.
Just my .02.....although, I think I'm up to .03 now.

Thanks for listening!
Steve
Here, I agree entirely, the ability to copy and paste multiple rows would be a nice addition. It would also be nice to have a similar facility for forms as well. The Q&A model of "Dittoing" the last form viewed is too limited and imprecise. We've been looking for a good way to use the GUI model of Copy/Cut/Paste as applied to entire forms, but as you might imagine - that can be very complicated when dealing with subforms and a dozen or so "widget" types - some with multiple "views".