Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Computer History (Read 18091 times)
GJK
Junior Member
**
Offline


Felix qui potuit rerum
cognoscere causas

Posts: 80
Location: Kankakee. Il
Joined: Apr 22nd, 2003
Re: Computer History
Reply #15 - Feb 18th, 2004 at 9:32pm
Print Post Print Post  
At home:
I started out on an Atari 400 with a touchpad keyboard and 4k of ram. We had to buy separate "Basic" language cartridges and cassette tape for storage. The first upgrade I made was to install a touch keybourd. My first floppy drive for the Atari was a 5.5" add on.

We used to type in code from "Antic" magazine, an Atari monthly published at the time.

At work:
I worked with IBM Displaywriters that were dedicated wordprocessors with 8.5" floppy drives.

The first true desktops at work were IBM PC XT with no hard drives but two 5.5" floppy drives. Our first hard drive was 10 megabytes. I remember  comments from co-workers that we had died and gone to heaven and that possibly no one could ever fill up that mother of all drives! These machines cost $2000.00 plus at the time. We then graduated to AT's and then to 286's. Those honeys cost over $3000.00 each.

Currently, we buy 2.6 Ghz machines at approximately $700.00 each. How times have changed!
Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GJK
Junior Member
**
Offline


Felix qui potuit rerum
cognoscere causas

Posts: 80
Location: Kankakee. Il
Joined: Apr 22nd, 2003
Re: Computer History
Reply #16 - Feb 18th, 2004 at 9:53pm
Print Post Print Post  
The first database that we used was PFS file. I too enjoyed learning and actually being very productive with PFS. I believe that I still have the original disks around somewhere. We set up a program for our Central Dietary Department, which tracked Dietary needs for 700 residents on a 24/7 basis. We tracked allergies, likes, dislikes in food and even kept track of inventory in the warehouse.

We were looking for a tool to merge the databases with a wordprocessor when PFS went out of business. I had tracked down some information that some of the programmers moved to Symantec and that there was a new product coming out called "Q&A" that might do what we needed. The rest is history.. as they say.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
johnbits
Member
*
Offline


No personal text

Posts: 41
Joined: Dec 25th, 2003
Re: Computer History
Reply #17 - Feb 23rd, 2004 at 3:36pm
Print Post Print Post  
What another great example of how this site is one of my favorite!

While working as a police supervisor in the Chief's office I had access to an Apple IIe and used a database from Stonewear that had some interesting features. I reviewed the four commercially available ready-built computers that had just entered this new market: the Apple II (monochrome video display), the Radio Shack Color Computer, the TI 400A, and the Commodore VIC-20. The Apple was the marketed business machine, but had an ugly display, an even uglier version of BASIC, and few bells and whistles. The Radio Shack, as would its successors, had little to offer. The TI was probably the most powerful, it even a had text-to-voice module, but it seemed unlikely to survive as a home computer as it was expensive to expand the system. The clear winner to me was the VIC-20. Starting with a WHOPPING 3.5K of memory, it ran loan programs, games, and had a very easy yet powerful BASIC language. With color, sound and graphics it was a choice that gave me what I wanted (I still have it)--a machine to start my computing experience!

The VIC grew to include a cassette tape drive, then a floppy drive, many expansion cards (like a wordprocessor [Fox], a really cool BASIC editor and memory)--all teatering on a poorly designed external expansion board. I added to 7.5" wide, low-res dot-matrix printer and a few other options (like a joystick) and finally had the memory boosted to maximum--20K.

I skipped the Commodore 64 and 128, marketed some Amigas while marketing manager for a 11-store ComputerLand franchise, and there got my intentonal exposure to the new DOS-based products from IBM. I got to use and watch IBM products grow as the leader, then enter into the final phase of IBM dominance, the AT. Shortly thereafter, I purchased a Compaq Deskpro 386. This machine was the market leader for a while until Compaq also began to lose focus, failed to prepare for some component vendor problems, and lost their rapid leadership hold.

Meanwhile, at IBM, the boys in blue were working hard to prove that the odd-ball, non-compatible 1.2MB floppy would not be the last of the errors they could produce in the DOS world they had created with Uncle Billy. There was the Intel Expanded/Entended specifications, confusing enough to many that even Intel reps could not explain at times. The PC Junior, essentially a DOA system, and IBM's portable computer philosophy that seemed to be bigger, slower, uglier, and, as would their PC and PC-2 lines, less and less "IBM compatible" than the other "IBM compatibles".

As a consultant, with our clients it was a suped-up Everex-based system called Proteus, replaced then by Dell and later by Gateway.

Gateway was my source for all systems since and that includes my current Pentium 4 system.

Along the way, so, so many wonderful DOS programs were discovered that allowed us all to do so many amazaing things. Superkey, Sidekick, PC-Anywhere, Remote, dBASE, Lotus 1-2-3, PC-Tools, Norton, and many others plus a host of hardware system options such as multi-user PCs, multi-monitor PCs, and the then emerging networking--such as 10-Net.

I became an early fan of the PFS series, using all (excepte the home-targeted First Choice) including the integratable Plan, File, Write, Access and Report. dBASE III became the obvious power system and replaced my use of spreadsheets for almost all applications. Despite the reported "power" of many of the wordprocessors, it was PFS: Write and later Professional Write that dominated my choice and recommendation for speed, ease of use and productivity for many clients. Later, when WordPerfect discovered Windows, they finally made a great product. I still sometimes use Write today when I need to do something quickly that I still cannot do in Windows products.

A Software City rep kept extolling the virtues of Q&A 1.0 versus the PFS series (and definitely over the weaker IBM Assistant version of these products). When I got a look, I was an instant believer. Although the companion communication and spreadsheet programs were missing, and a bit of the easier interface, the trade-off was a much, much more powerful and flexible product.

From there, the Q&A versions (DOS only!) and FoxPro became our development tools of choice (skipping Alpha and anything Microsoft). As Windows finally became a somewhat working product in version 3.1, and all the then leaders tried (and failed) to make Windows versions of their products, a clear line emerged. Those that would stop with their initial attempts and buy other companies instead--abandoning the products that built them, and those (like WordPerfect) that would finally find an environment that would allow them to find that magical balance of power and ease of use.

Although I reluctantly use MS-Word (between lockups) and other products, the loss of Q&A, Xtree and other programs that served so well is finally coming full circle. Ztree has arrived and works with gigabyte disks yet still offers the familiar interface, speed and flexibility. And in a world dominated by Access (EEEEE-YUUUUKKKKK!!!!), FileMaker (no, we do it OUR way--so must you!), Alpha 5(a great try--but a bit too many problems and bad interoperability), there finally emerges the long-awaited Sesame!

My biggest regret is that I have yet to be able to spend the time to at length pour threw the product, instead finding moments here and there to work with it, try to migrate to the new philosophies, marvel at some of the ingenuity while I lament the missing elements (macro editor, word processor, etc.), and read with GREAT interest and fascination the threads on this site. Shortly I hope to make Sesame the workhorse that Q&A was for me, my clients and with other programs.

With the great input from users, the supportive attitude of the Lanticans, and the survivability designed into the product, I once again look for experiences with computing from which I marvel and feel the "AAAAAAHHH!" each time I use the product.

A QUESTION: during the early years especially, many very creative concepts evolved that failed in the marketplace and were often later to emerge from a different source. Anyone remember the 3-D point-mouse, early voice command and X-10 modules, and other devices?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BOBSCOTT
Senior Member
Members
*****
Offline


That Darn Computer #$X#
{curse words}

Posts: 1195
Joined: Nov 22nd, 2002
Re: Computer History
Reply #18 - Feb 23rd, 2004 at 6:13pm
Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
A QUESTION:  Anyone remember  X-10 modules, and other devices?


johnbits,

Not only do I remember X-10 modules but I remember them when the carrier current concept was started with BSR. I still have original BSR modules working today with X-10, powerhouse, modern leviton, knock off smarthome and smartlink modules to control my entire home.

Do you remember Butler in a box command module for use with X-10?

I was thrilled to here you mention Ztree. The early versions of Xtree were some of my favorite utilities and I had no idea about Ztree. I will be checking out Ztree shortly.  Smiley

Thanks for the info.
  

Team – Together Everyone Achieves More
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LindyR
Member
*
Offline


Thanks Lanticans!!

Posts: 16
Location: Beaverton Oregon
Joined: Dec 15th, 2003
Re: Computer History
Reply #19 - Feb 23rd, 2004 at 9:18pm
Print Post Print Post  
>>I was thrilled to here you mention Ztree. The early versions of Xtree were some of my favorite utilities and I had no idea about Ztree. I will be checking out Ztree shortly.  <<

I loved Xtree and will be checking out Ztree.  I like TreeView, but it's not the same kind of ap. 

I used WordStar 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 (in CP/M and DOS) -- loved those old dot commands!  Did NOT use WS 2000.  I came kicking and screaming into WordPerfect 4.0 for DOS and finally settled in very comfortably with WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS -- I still use it to do things I just can NOT do in Windows Word and WordPerfect as efficiently.

I finally let my Exidy Sorcerer go to a computer museum last year.   Cry
  

Lindy Robertson&&Beaverton Oregon
Back to top
AIM AIM  
IP Logged
 
johnbits
Member
*
Offline


No personal text

Posts: 41
Joined: Dec 25th, 2003
Re: Computer History
Reply #20 - Feb 26th, 2004 at 1:12pm
Print Post Print Post  
I do remember some of those other items you all mentioned..more come to mind all the time. Since some of us are asking Lantica to include a basic word processor with Sesame as did Q&A, and since we have voiced our displeasure with many of the current ilk of products, maybe someone could tell me if they have found something else besides Professional Write (DOS) that will work with the Windows printer drivers (Professional Write does not obviously) that can do some of those marvelous, simple actions such as temporary indents, intelligent column math (without imbedded spreadsheet pieces), and rectangular block move (versus paragraph or line move)?

Also, though they are not PC's, handhelds have become an integral part of many of our lives. I started with various watch and data units (up to the Casio Boss). Last year I got my Palm, which has become indespensible. I use it with a handheld relational database, powerful outliner, powerful datebook and other apps, and hope to integrate (ODBC maybe?) with Sesame (unless they eventually come out with a handheld version some day). My wife & consulting partner had a Pocket PC after many earlier versions of handhelds, but now has a Palm Tungsten T3. Any thoughts or experience along this historical line?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BOBSCOTT
Senior Member
Members
*****
Offline


That Darn Computer #$X#
{curse words}

Posts: 1195
Joined: Nov 22nd, 2002
Re: Computer History
Reply #21 - Feb 26th, 2004 at 2:05pm
Print Post Print Post  
I would love  Smiley a palm version of Sesame.

Besides all the other conveniences handhelds offer think of how easy data collection could be for enterprise wide Sesame applications. loading docs, Drs from treatment room to treatment room, Techs in the field etc.

Besides with a palm version of Sesame I can claim I am working wherever I go. A laptop is to big to carry up a mountain like Mount Whitney but the palm equipped with GPS goes along everywhere.  Grin
  

Team – Together Everyone Achieves More
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send Topic Send Topic Print Print