Quote:It is exactly as though you placed the same word file in 10 different directories and then opened each and every directory in Explorer
Yes but you would see them in different directories which is not confusing. In this case of Sesame I'm getting multiply listings of the same database in the same directory.
my quote of
Quote:To me, it would be like opening "my documents" folder on C drive and finding 10 word documents with the same name because I placed the same object on different pages of the document
meaning one word document with 1 excel sheet pasted to 10 pages in the same doc would place 10 copies of the same document in the same folder!!!!!!!

As you can see I have a DB named "master" with subform db's as "projects", "estimate lab" and "estimate mat".
Projects has 2 forms "project list and project detail"
Now with the 2 duplicates of "projects"at the bottom of the Tree you can tell they are associated to "master/main" in this tree structure, but you have no idea they are the same db which give you the false thinking that they are duplicates, so lets delete them.
Quote:If a designer is certain that they have added a subform a particular form - but Sesame has "simplified" it away (so it only appears once) they will certainly have the impression that they failed to add the subform
Not if the form has the same name, it is listed on the tree and a link line connects it to the associated db's. You can then tell its the same subform on however many different associated levels.
Still a confusing view of the Tree and if I keep adding forms, well my monitor doesn't support a res high enough to view it all
Quote:But, because the initial tree can contain many items, we are adding the ability to remove (hide/reveal) items from the runtime command trees in the next major release. But that decision will be up to each designer, rather than the program itself.
I should have read this section more clearly and saved a lot of typing

With the ability to hide/reveal tree items this takes away the confusion of multiply listings.
thanks Mark.