There have been several moments since the arrival of Sesame when Access was looking pretty good, but in each case I found the answer someplace.  But now I'm stuck - maybe it cannot be done with this HTML report format.

1.  I have a report with several value fields.  They are all left justified on the report (RJ in the database).  Is there a way to align the decimals in the report?

2.  I have subtotals on a field break.  Is it necessary to have the column titles print again before the data resumes after the sutotals?

3.  Is there a way to insert a blank line after the subtotals?

4.  The report totals are two or three digits wider than the data points.  I assume that this is the reason that Sesame printed them out-of-alignment with the columns that they are derived from.  Is that controllable?

I am somewhat familiar with MS Excel.  So I have had good luck importing the HTML reports into Excel, and then formatting as required, (including sizing, etc.)
Jack

Thanks for the feedback.  While some of it was useful, it often served to point up areas of Sesame that are weak.

Ray the Reaper:  To my second question, you suggested putting the Titles into the View Header.  I tried that and they ended up all on the left side of the report.  The proper alignment was automatic in Q&A.

To the third suggestion, you basically suggest that I learn HTML to achieve a result that was automatic in Q&A.

To the fourth question, you suggested a workaround to get column totals to actually appear under the column.  Again, this was automatic in Q&A.

JFisher:  You suggested that I use Excel to format the report.  I tried this an it worked fine.  But why should I have to spend 5 minutes formatting a report each time I want to run it?

Lastly, Q&A reports could be previewed with a couple of clicks.  Previewing and producing reports in Sesame requires working through several menus.  This cannot be seen as an improvement.  Clearly Sesame's report design and production production is a giant step backwards.  I hope you will improve it in the future so it is at least as user friendly as Q&A was.

Again, thanks for the feedback.